Tilt-table testing of patients with pacemaker and recurrent syncope

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Standard

Tilt-table testing of patients with pacemaker and recurrent syncope. / Nielsen, Christian E. Haarmark; Kanters, Jørgen K; Mehlsen, Jesper.

I: Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal, Bind 15, Nr. 4, 05.03.2016, s. 193-198.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Nielsen, CEH, Kanters, JK & Mehlsen, J 2016, 'Tilt-table testing of patients with pacemaker and recurrent syncope', Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal, bind 15, nr. 4, s. 193-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2015.10.007

APA

Nielsen, C. E. H., Kanters, J. K., & Mehlsen, J. (2016). Tilt-table testing of patients with pacemaker and recurrent syncope. Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal, 15(4), 193-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2015.10.007

Vancouver

Nielsen CEH, Kanters JK, Mehlsen J. Tilt-table testing of patients with pacemaker and recurrent syncope. Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal. 2016 mar. 5;15(4):193-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2015.10.007

Author

Nielsen, Christian E. Haarmark ; Kanters, Jørgen K ; Mehlsen, Jesper. / Tilt-table testing of patients with pacemaker and recurrent syncope. I: Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal. 2016 ; Bind 15, Nr. 4. s. 193-198.

Bibtex

@article{14ffc8a6c73e4c94a9f9cae12c578312,
title = "Tilt-table testing of patients with pacemaker and recurrent syncope",
abstract = "The diagnosis of recurrent syncope in patients with pacemakers (PM) is quite challenging and the etiology of syncope is often multifactorial. To portray the mechanism of syncope in PM patients, we report the results of head-up tilt table testing (HUT) in a series of patients with PM, originally implanted for reasons other than neurally mediated syncope, referred due to syncope or pre-syncope (aborted syncope, vertigo, suspected orthostatic hypotension). Forty-one patients with PM undergoing a HUT in our syncope unit between January 1st, 2007 and December 31st 2011 were included. A standard HUT protocol with nitroglycerine provocation was used and the test results were classified according to current guidelines. Baseline data were retrieved from the medical records. Overall, 54% of patients had a positive response to HUT. Vasodepressor or orthostatic hypotensive response were the most prevalent responses accounting for 72% of patients with a positive test. There were no differences between groups with positive or negative test result regarding age, gender, resting blood pressure and heart rate, daily fluid intake, pacing mode, pacing indication or pacing rhythm at rest. HUT in patients with pacemakers has a high diagnostic yield. Although, the majority of patients had a vasodepressor or orthostatic hypotensive response, cardioinhibitory response leading to syncope was also seen.",
author = "Nielsen, {Christian E. Haarmark} and Kanters, {J{\o}rgen K} and Jesper Mehlsen",
year = "2016",
month = mar,
day = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.ipej.2015.10.007",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "193--198",
journal = "Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal",
issn = "0972-6292",
publisher = "Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Group",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tilt-table testing of patients with pacemaker and recurrent syncope

AU - Nielsen, Christian E. Haarmark

AU - Kanters, Jørgen K

AU - Mehlsen, Jesper

PY - 2016/3/5

Y1 - 2016/3/5

N2 - The diagnosis of recurrent syncope in patients with pacemakers (PM) is quite challenging and the etiology of syncope is often multifactorial. To portray the mechanism of syncope in PM patients, we report the results of head-up tilt table testing (HUT) in a series of patients with PM, originally implanted for reasons other than neurally mediated syncope, referred due to syncope or pre-syncope (aborted syncope, vertigo, suspected orthostatic hypotension). Forty-one patients with PM undergoing a HUT in our syncope unit between January 1st, 2007 and December 31st 2011 were included. A standard HUT protocol with nitroglycerine provocation was used and the test results were classified according to current guidelines. Baseline data were retrieved from the medical records. Overall, 54% of patients had a positive response to HUT. Vasodepressor or orthostatic hypotensive response were the most prevalent responses accounting for 72% of patients with a positive test. There were no differences between groups with positive or negative test result regarding age, gender, resting blood pressure and heart rate, daily fluid intake, pacing mode, pacing indication or pacing rhythm at rest. HUT in patients with pacemakers has a high diagnostic yield. Although, the majority of patients had a vasodepressor or orthostatic hypotensive response, cardioinhibitory response leading to syncope was also seen.

AB - The diagnosis of recurrent syncope in patients with pacemakers (PM) is quite challenging and the etiology of syncope is often multifactorial. To portray the mechanism of syncope in PM patients, we report the results of head-up tilt table testing (HUT) in a series of patients with PM, originally implanted for reasons other than neurally mediated syncope, referred due to syncope or pre-syncope (aborted syncope, vertigo, suspected orthostatic hypotension). Forty-one patients with PM undergoing a HUT in our syncope unit between January 1st, 2007 and December 31st 2011 were included. A standard HUT protocol with nitroglycerine provocation was used and the test results were classified according to current guidelines. Baseline data were retrieved from the medical records. Overall, 54% of patients had a positive response to HUT. Vasodepressor or orthostatic hypotensive response were the most prevalent responses accounting for 72% of patients with a positive test. There were no differences between groups with positive or negative test result regarding age, gender, resting blood pressure and heart rate, daily fluid intake, pacing mode, pacing indication or pacing rhythm at rest. HUT in patients with pacemakers has a high diagnostic yield. Although, the majority of patients had a vasodepressor or orthostatic hypotensive response, cardioinhibitory response leading to syncope was also seen.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ipej.2015.10.007

DO - 10.1016/j.ipej.2015.10.007

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26937118

VL - 15

SP - 193

EP - 198

JO - Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal

JF - Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal

SN - 0972-6292

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 165711854