The journey of research data: Accessing nordic health data for the purposes of developing an algorithm

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Standard

The journey of research data: Accessing nordic health data for the purposes of developing an algorithm. / Ó Cathaoir, Katharina; Gunnarsdóttir, Hrefna Dögg; Hartlev, Mette.

I: Medical Law International, Bind 22, Nr. 1, 2022, s. 52-74.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ó Cathaoir, K, Gunnarsdóttir, HD & Hartlev, M 2022, 'The journey of research data: Accessing nordic health data for the purposes of developing an algorithm', Medical Law International, bind 22, nr. 1, s. 52-74. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F09685332211046179

APA

Ó Cathaoir, K., Gunnarsdóttir, H. D., & Hartlev, M. (2022). The journey of research data: Accessing nordic health data for the purposes of developing an algorithm. Medical Law International, 22(1), 52-74. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F09685332211046179

Vancouver

Ó Cathaoir K, Gunnarsdóttir HD, Hartlev M. The journey of research data: Accessing nordic health data for the purposes of developing an algorithm. Medical Law International. 2022;22(1):52-74. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F09685332211046179

Author

Ó Cathaoir, Katharina ; Gunnarsdóttir, Hrefna Dögg ; Hartlev, Mette. / The journey of research data: Accessing nordic health data for the purposes of developing an algorithm. I: Medical Law International. 2022 ; Bind 22, Nr. 1. s. 52-74.

Bibtex

@article{c0a783f6cdfb4e1d93144f0928f9de75,
title = "The journey of research data: Accessing nordic health data for the purposes of developing an algorithm",
abstract = "This article traces the journey of Nordic health data requested for developing a healthcare algorithm. We focus on the legal requirements and highlight that differences in the legislation of Denmark, Norway and Iceland, and the interpretation thereof by responsible bodies, can pose a barrier for scientific researchers. In addition, non-legal institutional requirements or practices may hamper data access. First, despite some European harmonization, the mandate of research ethics committees and the data protection authorities vary in the three countries. Second, domestic institutions impose tailored requirements, sometimes only allowing domestic or affiliated researchers to access data sets. Third, the manner in which a dataset is collected, catalogued and stored has implications for data access. We make several recommendations for increasing transparency in Nordic data access, such as, increasing knowledge sharing regarding interpretation of General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) criteria, adopting clearer regulations and pursuing greater citizen engagement in secondary use of health data.",
keywords = "Faculty of Law",
author = "{{\'O} Cathaoir}, Katharina and Gunnarsd{\'o}ttir, {Hrefna D{\"o}gg} and Mette Hartlev",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1177%2F09685332211046179",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "52--74",
journal = "Medical Law International",
issn = "0968-5332",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The journey of research data: Accessing nordic health data for the purposes of developing an algorithm

AU - Ó Cathaoir, Katharina

AU - Gunnarsdóttir, Hrefna Dögg

AU - Hartlev, Mette

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - This article traces the journey of Nordic health data requested for developing a healthcare algorithm. We focus on the legal requirements and highlight that differences in the legislation of Denmark, Norway and Iceland, and the interpretation thereof by responsible bodies, can pose a barrier for scientific researchers. In addition, non-legal institutional requirements or practices may hamper data access. First, despite some European harmonization, the mandate of research ethics committees and the data protection authorities vary in the three countries. Second, domestic institutions impose tailored requirements, sometimes only allowing domestic or affiliated researchers to access data sets. Third, the manner in which a dataset is collected, catalogued and stored has implications for data access. We make several recommendations for increasing transparency in Nordic data access, such as, increasing knowledge sharing regarding interpretation of General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) criteria, adopting clearer regulations and pursuing greater citizen engagement in secondary use of health data.

AB - This article traces the journey of Nordic health data requested for developing a healthcare algorithm. We focus on the legal requirements and highlight that differences in the legislation of Denmark, Norway and Iceland, and the interpretation thereof by responsible bodies, can pose a barrier for scientific researchers. In addition, non-legal institutional requirements or practices may hamper data access. First, despite some European harmonization, the mandate of research ethics committees and the data protection authorities vary in the three countries. Second, domestic institutions impose tailored requirements, sometimes only allowing domestic or affiliated researchers to access data sets. Third, the manner in which a dataset is collected, catalogued and stored has implications for data access. We make several recommendations for increasing transparency in Nordic data access, such as, increasing knowledge sharing regarding interpretation of General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) criteria, adopting clearer regulations and pursuing greater citizen engagement in secondary use of health data.

KW - Faculty of Law

U2 - 10.1177%2F09685332211046179

DO - 10.1177%2F09685332211046179

M3 - Journal article

VL - 22

SP - 52

EP - 74

JO - Medical Law International

JF - Medical Law International

SN - 0968-5332

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 280064496