Necropsy Validation of a Novel Method for Left Ventricular Mass Quantification in Porcine Transthoracic and Transdiaphragmal Echocardiography

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Necropsy Validation of a Novel Method for Left Ventricular Mass Quantification in Porcine Transthoracic and Transdiaphragmal Echocardiography. / Kristensen, Charlotte Burup; Sattler, Stefan Michael; Lubberding, Anniek Frederike; Tfelt-Hansen, Jacob; Jespersen, Thomas; Hassager, Christian; Mogelvang, Rasmus.

I: Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, Bind 9, 868603, 2022.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Kristensen, CB, Sattler, SM, Lubberding, AF, Tfelt-Hansen, J, Jespersen, T, Hassager, C & Mogelvang, R 2022, 'Necropsy Validation of a Novel Method for Left Ventricular Mass Quantification in Porcine Transthoracic and Transdiaphragmal Echocardiography', Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, bind 9, 868603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.868603

APA

Kristensen, C. B., Sattler, S. M., Lubberding, A. F., Tfelt-Hansen, J., Jespersen, T., Hassager, C., & Mogelvang, R. (2022). Necropsy Validation of a Novel Method for Left Ventricular Mass Quantification in Porcine Transthoracic and Transdiaphragmal Echocardiography. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 9, [868603]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.868603

Vancouver

Kristensen CB, Sattler SM, Lubberding AF, Tfelt-Hansen J, Jespersen T, Hassager C o.a. Necropsy Validation of a Novel Method for Left Ventricular Mass Quantification in Porcine Transthoracic and Transdiaphragmal Echocardiography. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2022;9. 868603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.868603

Author

Kristensen, Charlotte Burup ; Sattler, Stefan Michael ; Lubberding, Anniek Frederike ; Tfelt-Hansen, Jacob ; Jespersen, Thomas ; Hassager, Christian ; Mogelvang, Rasmus. / Necropsy Validation of a Novel Method for Left Ventricular Mass Quantification in Porcine Transthoracic and Transdiaphragmal Echocardiography. I: Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2022 ; Bind 9.

Bibtex

@article{90aaabb6488b4cc9ac3ca3f4457d6403,
title = "Necropsy Validation of a Novel Method for Left Ventricular Mass Quantification in Porcine Transthoracic and Transdiaphragmal Echocardiography",
abstract = "Introduction: Increased left ventricular mass (LVM) is one of the most powerful predictors of adverse cardiovascular events. Clinical evaluation requires reliable, accurate and reproducible echocardiographic LVM-quantification to manage patients. For this purpose, we have developed a novel two-dimensional (2D) method based on adding the mean wall thickness to the left ventricular volume acquired by the biplane method of disks, which has recently been validated in humans using cardiac magnetic resonance as reference value. We assessed the hypothesis that the novel method has better accuracy than conventional one-dimensional (1D) methods, when compared to necropsy LVM in pigs.Materials and Methods: Echocardiography was performed during anesthesia in 34 Danish Landrace pigs, weight 47-59 kg. All pigs were euthanized, cardiac necropsy was performed and the left ventricle was trimmed and weighed for necropsy LVM. Trans-thoracic echocardiography was applied for parasternal images. Transdiaphragmal echocardiography was applied for the apical images, which are otherwise difficult to obtain in pigs. We compared the conventional 1D- and 2D-methods and the novel 2D-method to the LVM from cardiac necropsy.Results: Necropsy LVM was 132 ± 11 g (mean ± SD). The novel method had better accuracy than other methods (mean difference ± 95% limits of agreement; coefficients of variation; standard error of the estimate, Pearson's correlation). Novel (-1 ± 20 g; 8%; 11 g; r = 0.70), Devereux (+26 ± 37 g; 15%; 33 g; r = 0.52), Area-Length (+27 ± 34 g; 13 %; 33 g; r = 0.63), Truncated Ellipsoid (+10 ± 30 g; 12%; 19 g; r = 0.63), biplane endo-/epicardial tracing (-3 ± 2 g; 10%; 14 g; r = 0.57). No proportional bias in linear regression was detected for any method, when compared to necropsy LVM. Conclusion: We confirm high accuracy of the novel 2D-based method compared to conventional 1D/2D-methods.",
author = "Kristensen, {Charlotte Burup} and Sattler, {Stefan Michael} and Lubberding, {Anniek Frederike} and Jacob Tfelt-Hansen and Thomas Jespersen and Christian Hassager and Rasmus Mogelvang",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2022 Kristensen, Sattler, Lubberding, Tfelt-Hansen, Jespersen, Hassager and Mogelvang.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.3389/fcvm.2022.868603",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine",
issn = "2297-055X",
publisher = "Frontiers Media",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Necropsy Validation of a Novel Method for Left Ventricular Mass Quantification in Porcine Transthoracic and Transdiaphragmal Echocardiography

AU - Kristensen, Charlotte Burup

AU - Sattler, Stefan Michael

AU - Lubberding, Anniek Frederike

AU - Tfelt-Hansen, Jacob

AU - Jespersen, Thomas

AU - Hassager, Christian

AU - Mogelvang, Rasmus

N1 - Copyright © 2022 Kristensen, Sattler, Lubberding, Tfelt-Hansen, Jespersen, Hassager and Mogelvang.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Introduction: Increased left ventricular mass (LVM) is one of the most powerful predictors of adverse cardiovascular events. Clinical evaluation requires reliable, accurate and reproducible echocardiographic LVM-quantification to manage patients. For this purpose, we have developed a novel two-dimensional (2D) method based on adding the mean wall thickness to the left ventricular volume acquired by the biplane method of disks, which has recently been validated in humans using cardiac magnetic resonance as reference value. We assessed the hypothesis that the novel method has better accuracy than conventional one-dimensional (1D) methods, when compared to necropsy LVM in pigs.Materials and Methods: Echocardiography was performed during anesthesia in 34 Danish Landrace pigs, weight 47-59 kg. All pigs were euthanized, cardiac necropsy was performed and the left ventricle was trimmed and weighed for necropsy LVM. Trans-thoracic echocardiography was applied for parasternal images. Transdiaphragmal echocardiography was applied for the apical images, which are otherwise difficult to obtain in pigs. We compared the conventional 1D- and 2D-methods and the novel 2D-method to the LVM from cardiac necropsy.Results: Necropsy LVM was 132 ± 11 g (mean ± SD). The novel method had better accuracy than other methods (mean difference ± 95% limits of agreement; coefficients of variation; standard error of the estimate, Pearson's correlation). Novel (-1 ± 20 g; 8%; 11 g; r = 0.70), Devereux (+26 ± 37 g; 15%; 33 g; r = 0.52), Area-Length (+27 ± 34 g; 13 %; 33 g; r = 0.63), Truncated Ellipsoid (+10 ± 30 g; 12%; 19 g; r = 0.63), biplane endo-/epicardial tracing (-3 ± 2 g; 10%; 14 g; r = 0.57). No proportional bias in linear regression was detected for any method, when compared to necropsy LVM. Conclusion: We confirm high accuracy of the novel 2D-based method compared to conventional 1D/2D-methods.

AB - Introduction: Increased left ventricular mass (LVM) is one of the most powerful predictors of adverse cardiovascular events. Clinical evaluation requires reliable, accurate and reproducible echocardiographic LVM-quantification to manage patients. For this purpose, we have developed a novel two-dimensional (2D) method based on adding the mean wall thickness to the left ventricular volume acquired by the biplane method of disks, which has recently been validated in humans using cardiac magnetic resonance as reference value. We assessed the hypothesis that the novel method has better accuracy than conventional one-dimensional (1D) methods, when compared to necropsy LVM in pigs.Materials and Methods: Echocardiography was performed during anesthesia in 34 Danish Landrace pigs, weight 47-59 kg. All pigs were euthanized, cardiac necropsy was performed and the left ventricle was trimmed and weighed for necropsy LVM. Trans-thoracic echocardiography was applied for parasternal images. Transdiaphragmal echocardiography was applied for the apical images, which are otherwise difficult to obtain in pigs. We compared the conventional 1D- and 2D-methods and the novel 2D-method to the LVM from cardiac necropsy.Results: Necropsy LVM was 132 ± 11 g (mean ± SD). The novel method had better accuracy than other methods (mean difference ± 95% limits of agreement; coefficients of variation; standard error of the estimate, Pearson's correlation). Novel (-1 ± 20 g; 8%; 11 g; r = 0.70), Devereux (+26 ± 37 g; 15%; 33 g; r = 0.52), Area-Length (+27 ± 34 g; 13 %; 33 g; r = 0.63), Truncated Ellipsoid (+10 ± 30 g; 12%; 19 g; r = 0.63), biplane endo-/epicardial tracing (-3 ± 2 g; 10%; 14 g; r = 0.57). No proportional bias in linear regression was detected for any method, when compared to necropsy LVM. Conclusion: We confirm high accuracy of the novel 2D-based method compared to conventional 1D/2D-methods.

U2 - 10.3389/fcvm.2022.868603

DO - 10.3389/fcvm.2022.868603

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35592401

VL - 9

JO - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

JF - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

SN - 2297-055X

M1 - 868603

ER -

ID: 307081669