Comparing twelve-lead electrocardiography with close-to-heart patch based electrocardiography

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Comparing twelve-lead electrocardiography with close-to-heart patch based electrocardiography. / Hansen, Ingeborg H; Hoppe, Karsten; Gjerde, Anna; Kanters, Joergen K; Sorensen, Helge B D.

I: I E E E Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference Proceedings, Bind 2015, 2015, s. 330-333.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hansen, IH, Hoppe, K, Gjerde, A, Kanters, JK & Sorensen, HBD 2015, 'Comparing twelve-lead electrocardiography with close-to-heart patch based electrocardiography', I E E E Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference Proceedings, bind 2015, s. 330-333. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318366

APA

Hansen, I. H., Hoppe, K., Gjerde, A., Kanters, J. K., & Sorensen, H. B. D. (2015). Comparing twelve-lead electrocardiography with close-to-heart patch based electrocardiography. I E E E Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference Proceedings, 2015, 330-333. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318366

Vancouver

Hansen IH, Hoppe K, Gjerde A, Kanters JK, Sorensen HBD. Comparing twelve-lead electrocardiography with close-to-heart patch based electrocardiography. I E E E Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference Proceedings. 2015;2015:330-333. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318366

Author

Hansen, Ingeborg H ; Hoppe, Karsten ; Gjerde, Anna ; Kanters, Joergen K ; Sorensen, Helge B D. / Comparing twelve-lead electrocardiography with close-to-heart patch based electrocardiography. I: I E E E Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference Proceedings. 2015 ; Bind 2015. s. 330-333.

Bibtex

@article{99a62b5fa75b4a5db3786cb3d5e4702b,
title = "Comparing twelve-lead electrocardiography with close-to-heart patch based electrocardiography",
abstract = "Electrocardiographic (ECG) recording using adhesive patch-type ECG monitors (PEMs) has several advantages over conventional ECG recorders. However, due to the unconventional electrode locations used in PEM systems, the morphology of the acquired ECG signals may differ from conventional ECG leads used in the clinic impeding clinical interpretation. In this study, recordings from an ePatch{\textregistered} lead system involving three torso sites are compared with concurrently recorded standard 12-lead ECG. Pearson's correlation coefficients (CC) of -0.90 and 0.91 is found between two of the PEM signals and the standard 12-lead ECG signals aVR and V2, respectively. Deriving the 12-lead ECG from the PEM leads through linear transforms on a subject-specific basis yield CC values ranging from 0.78 to 0.96 between measured and derived leads. The corresponding CC values for the PEM ECG leads range from 0.88 to 0.95. It is found that the PEM lead system captures {"}residual{"} information not contained in the standard 12-lead ECG and i.a. a negative deflection after the T-wave is discovered in the PEM signals.",
author = "Hansen, {Ingeborg H} and Karsten Hoppe and Anna Gjerde and Kanters, {Joergen K} and Sorensen, {Helge B D}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318366",
language = "English",
volume = "2015",
pages = "330--333",
journal = "Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings",
issn = "0589-1019",
publisher = "IEEE Signal Processing Society",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing twelve-lead electrocardiography with close-to-heart patch based electrocardiography

AU - Hansen, Ingeborg H

AU - Hoppe, Karsten

AU - Gjerde, Anna

AU - Kanters, Joergen K

AU - Sorensen, Helge B D

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Electrocardiographic (ECG) recording using adhesive patch-type ECG monitors (PEMs) has several advantages over conventional ECG recorders. However, due to the unconventional electrode locations used in PEM systems, the morphology of the acquired ECG signals may differ from conventional ECG leads used in the clinic impeding clinical interpretation. In this study, recordings from an ePatch® lead system involving three torso sites are compared with concurrently recorded standard 12-lead ECG. Pearson's correlation coefficients (CC) of -0.90 and 0.91 is found between two of the PEM signals and the standard 12-lead ECG signals aVR and V2, respectively. Deriving the 12-lead ECG from the PEM leads through linear transforms on a subject-specific basis yield CC values ranging from 0.78 to 0.96 between measured and derived leads. The corresponding CC values for the PEM ECG leads range from 0.88 to 0.95. It is found that the PEM lead system captures "residual" information not contained in the standard 12-lead ECG and i.a. a negative deflection after the T-wave is discovered in the PEM signals.

AB - Electrocardiographic (ECG) recording using adhesive patch-type ECG monitors (PEMs) has several advantages over conventional ECG recorders. However, due to the unconventional electrode locations used in PEM systems, the morphology of the acquired ECG signals may differ from conventional ECG leads used in the clinic impeding clinical interpretation. In this study, recordings from an ePatch® lead system involving three torso sites are compared with concurrently recorded standard 12-lead ECG. Pearson's correlation coefficients (CC) of -0.90 and 0.91 is found between two of the PEM signals and the standard 12-lead ECG signals aVR and V2, respectively. Deriving the 12-lead ECG from the PEM leads through linear transforms on a subject-specific basis yield CC values ranging from 0.78 to 0.96 between measured and derived leads. The corresponding CC values for the PEM ECG leads range from 0.88 to 0.95. It is found that the PEM lead system captures "residual" information not contained in the standard 12-lead ECG and i.a. a negative deflection after the T-wave is discovered in the PEM signals.

U2 - 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318366

DO - 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318366

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26736266

VL - 2015

SP - 330

EP - 333

JO - Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings

JF - Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings

SN - 0589-1019

ER -

ID: 165711664